Rivkah Writes…

July 21, 2009

RIFs, Terminations, and Other Delights of Corporate Etymology


You’ve heard that layoffs* are imminent – or, in the words of the Department Wit – RIFs are rife. What’s not clear is whether you’ll be RIF-d, fired, or canned.

Let’s take a step back and analyze some of more arcane of these terms, like RIF. For those of you who’ve managed to remain blissfully ignorant of the term, RIF is an abbreviation for Reduction in Force, which in its turn, is a euphemism for being laid off, which in its turn is one way of saying you’ve been let go, which in its turn…I could go on, but will spare you.

The point is, RIF joins the pantheon of wildly euphemistic expressions for losing a job. Why euphemize a necessary corporate decision? Because no company or CEO wants to be associated with human grief, humiliation, and all the nasty, messy stuff job loss entails. So any kind of language that throws a mist of ambiguity over the stark truth is an absolute boon to the corporate hierarchy.

The funny thing about ambiguity, though, is the variety of meanings it can disguise. After all, the only reason RIFs signify job loss to us, is the same reason Pavlov’s dogs started drooling for food when they heard a bell  – conditioning – the combining of a neutral stimulus with an unconditioned stimulus which, through repeated pairing, turns into a conditioned response. So after a while, we don’t think about the phonetic associations or actual denotation of RIFs, because like Dr. Pavlov’s canines, we’ve bought into the whole conditioned reflex scenario.

But humor me, if you will, and assume you’re one of fortunate few who’ve never heard of RIF or any of the veiled references to job loss. What might be the first thing to enter your mind when you hear one of these terms?  

Let’s start with RIF. Add another “f” to “RIF” and you’ve got, in essence, a joke or witty expression. Like my riff on the inanities of corporate etymology. So before conditioning turns the phonetic denotation of “riff” into its unmistakable connotation, the mysterious RIF could be misunderstood as a joke or sly aside – hardly subtle on the part of corporate when you think about it. I can see the headlines now, “Getting Fired Isn’t Funny!” or “RIFs – Nothing to Riff About.”

Here’s another favorite of mine: “Your position is being eliminated.” Now to “eliminate” means to get rid of – it also means to expel waste from the body. So as the possible meanings of this expression pass through your mind, you’d be forgiven for the accompanying restroom imagery. No wonder you run tearfully from the site of your “elimination” deeming yourself no better than toilet paper. As for being “terminated” – Schwarzenegger machine-gunning his way through your cubicle wouldn’t be an unusual stretch.

So what do we have here? Instead of some harmlessly bland expressions prompting employees to vacate the premises in a civilized fashion, we have arguably harmful expressions whose ambiguity connotes a variety of unpleasant meanings. Is it any wonder, then, that getting RIF-d, eliminated or terminated is seen as a personal affront?

In his famous 1946 essay, “Politics and the English Language,” George Orwell wrote

“Modern English, especially written English, is full of bad habits which spread by imitation and which can be avoided if one is willing to take the necessary trouble. If one gets rid of these habits one can think more clearly…”

Precisely. Which begs the question – does corporate America seek to think more clearly? I leave you with this parting thought: on occasion, playing dumb isn’t the sole province of blondes.

 

*For more articles related to layoffs and unemployment, please click on Laid Off: Variations on a Theme and You Know You’ve Reached an All-Time Low When…

Advertisements

10 Comments »

  1. I think this is the first blog I’ve read that I really enjoyed. Thanks. Perhaps I should take a lesson from you and spice mine up a bit in a like manner. http://alicerene.wordpress.com

    Comment by Alice Rene — July 22, 2009 @ 11:23 am | Reply

  2. LOL – why not? Spicy makes the world go round! Thanks for your comment-R

    Comment by rivkahwrites — July 22, 2009 @ 12:43 pm | Reply

  3. When Wachovia (or as I refer to them as “Walk over ya”) Bank entered into a Joint Venture with Prudential Financial, everyone was laid off.

    But later, I received a letter that referred to me being a “transitioned employee”.

    Now, the fact that they referred to me as an employee at all was confusing enough, but a Transitioned Employee? Wouldn’t that mean that I was still working for them but going to another department?

    In a manner of speaking, I was. The Labor Department, Unemployment Division!

    Comment by Lou Yoskowitz — July 22, 2009 @ 2:22 pm | Reply

    • That sounds familiar – but at least you or I can use that piece of jargon to OUR advantage too. On prospective job queries, for example I don’t say I was laid off – nope; too close to home. What we say “I’m currently in transition following a round of layoffs” – sounds so much more delicate, don’t you think ;)!

      Comment by rivkahwrites — July 22, 2009 @ 3:34 pm | Reply

  4. Rivkah,

    Good stuff. I like your sense of humor despite the tough subject. Your other piece on unemployment was great, too.

    frank

    Comment by frankmundo — July 22, 2009 @ 2:36 pm | Reply

    • Thanks Frank!

      Comment by rivkahwrites — July 22, 2009 @ 3:29 pm | Reply

  5. Good thoughts, and you gave me a good laugh too so that made doubly good. Between the “elimination,” and the reference to the “Govenator” I got the point and the laugh!

    Comment by clbro — July 22, 2009 @ 9:05 pm | Reply

    • I’m glad, Christi!

      Comment by rivkahwrites — July 22, 2009 @ 10:54 pm | Reply

  6. The one that really takes the cake is “right-size” as a verb.
    “We are taking steps to right-size the company.”
    So I guess I was the wrong size, right?

    Horselady

    Comment by Cathy — July 23, 2009 @ 12:47 pm | Reply

    • omg – I want to say that’s hilarious – except it must have hurt like hell. What did they put in your severance package – a subscription to weight watchers??!! Hope is better for you now-R

      Comment by rivkahwrites — July 23, 2009 @ 4:25 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: